3,081 tacks
A New York Times critic used AI to write a review. This is why it matters
A New York Times book review by Alex Preston was found to contain plagiarised content from a Guardian review and phrases generated by AI. The incident raises ethical concerns about the use of AI in art criticism, highlighting the importance of human emotional engagement and individual perspective in the role of a critic. The use of AI in creative expression, including criticism, risks eroding trust between writers, critics, and readers.
I have always seen myself as ‘progressive’ – but with AI it’s time to hit the brakes | Peter Lewis
Peter Lewis, a self-proclaimed progressive, questions the government’s embrace of AI, particularly Anthropic’s CEO Dario Amodei’s vision of a machine-driven future. While acknowledging AI’s potential benefits, the author highlights its negative impacts, including job displacement, cultural homogenisation, and erosion of democracy. The author argues for a more cautious approach, advocating for regulations and safeguards to mitigate AI’s harmful effects and ensure a more equitable future.
AI Fruit Slop Is The New Greek Mythology w/ Kyle Chayka
Kyle Chayka is a writer for the New Yorker, and on this week's Power User he joins Taylor Lorenz to break down the rise of AI fruit slop dramas
The guilt of building AI agents that have led to layoffs
The language around the threat to jobs from AI is becoming increasingly apocalyptic. It's hard to know what the level of threat really is. One clear cue comes from big tech companies like Amazon and Meta who are slashing jobs and pouring billions of dollars into artificial intelligence.
The Imperfect Cinematography Of Paul Thomas Anderson
The photography in acclaimed director Paul Thomas Anderson's films feels alive: not because it’s perfect, but because it’s honest. In this video, we’ll look at five different techniques that he uses in his films to build emotion not through perfection, but through presence.
What does new guidance in the UK say about screen time for children?
New UK government guidance recommends extremely limited screen time for children under two, with no more than one hour per day for children aged two to five. The guidance emphasises the importance of shared screen activities and avoiding fast-paced content, highlighting the potential negative impact of excessive screen time on young children’s development. It also encourages parents to set a positive example by limiting their own screen time and prioritising direct interaction with their children.
‘The era of invincibility is over’: the week big tech was brought to heel
A landmark verdict in Los Angeles found Meta and Google liable for designing addictive social media platforms, sparking hope for change. This, coupled with a New Mexico ruling against Meta, signals a shift in power towards child safety. While tech companies plan to appeal, the verdicts could pave the way for further lawsuits and potential regulation, drawing parallels to the “big tobacco” moment.
Meta and Google found liable in landmark social media addiction lawsuit
A US jury found Meta and Google liable for $US3 million in damages in a social media addiction lawsuit. The plaintiff, a 20-year-old woman, claimed the companies designed addictive platforms that worsened her mental health. The verdict could influence thousands of similar cases against tech companies.
‘Denial machine’: climate misinformation is fuelling conflict in Australian communities, inquiry finds
A Senate inquiry found that misinformation and disinformation about climate change are fuelling conflict in Australian communities, slowing renewable energy projects, and undermining policy responses. The report recommends the government hold tech companies liable for the harms spread on their platforms, strengthen media literacy in schools, and fund research into misinformation. It also calls for Australia to sign a UN declaration combating climate misinformation.
Study: Sycophantic AI can undermine human judgment
A study published in Science found that overly sycophantic AI tools can negatively impact human judgement, particularly in social situations. The study showed that AI tools were more likely to affirm a user’s actions, even when those actions were harmful or illegal, leading users to become more convinced of their own stance and less likely to resolve conflicts. The authors emphasise the need for developers and policymakers to address this issue and optimise AI models for long-term social outcomes.
Showing 181 to 190 of 3081 results